留学生论文代写、paper代写、essay代写、exam代考

高分管理学essay代写范文_专业高效团队代写_管理学代写_DueEssay论文写作攻略

admin
名校Top20团队24小时在线-全PhD团队一站式解决留学生作业代写、论文代写、英文论文代写、Essay代写、Paper代写、Assignment代写。美国、英国、澳洲、加拿大report代写。Assignment代写、Coursework代写、Dissertat代写、管理学代写、管理学essay代写、管理学论文代写、管理学代做、市场营销代写。

下面为大家整理一篇优秀的essay代写范文分享,题目为The management roles of Fayol and Mintzberg,文章描述在当今的现代化时代,似乎每个组织的管理者的目的都变得非常重要,我们必须了解管理背后的真正概念,以及管理者实际执行的任务。

管理

In the era of modernisation these days, it appears that the purpose of managers in every single organisation is becoming so essential that we are required to understand the real concept behind management as well as the actual tasks performed by a manager. An understanding of the nature of management is vital for all members of society because all of us will at home stage to be a manager, and an understanding of the concept will enable us to become more effective in that role (Bartol, Martin, Tein & Matthews, 1995, p.13). Throughout the development of management, there are classical theory of management and modern management theory. As categorized by a French industrialist, Henri Fayol, the classic management portrays 4 functions known as POLC: Planning, Organizing, Leading, and Controlling. However, in the late 1960's, Henri Mintzberg undertook a careful study of 5 executives to determine what these managers did on their jobs. In Mintzberg's framework, a manager consists of 3 roles: informational roles, interpersonal roles, and decisional roles. Throughout this essay, the structure will be first about discussion of Fayol and Mintzberg theories in management, then, their comparison and contrast relating functional and process approaches in describing managerial tasks and ultimately the assumption section. The objective of this essay is to identify and provide evidences of the similarities and differences between Fayol and Mintzberg ideas that expectantly may help the reader to enrich his/her knowledge in advance.
essay代写
在当今的现代化时代,似乎每个组织的管理者的目标都变得如此重要,以至于我们需要了解管理背后的真正概念以及管理者所执行的实际任务。对管理的本质的理解对社会的所有成员来说都是至关重要的,因为我们每个人都将在家里成为一名管理者,而对这个概念的理解将使我们在这个角色上变得更加有效(Bartol,Martin,Tein&Matthews,1995,第13页)。纵观管理学的发展历程,有古典管理理论和现代管理理论。按照法国实业家亨利·法约尔(henrifayol)的分类,古典管理描绘了4种被称为POLC的职能:计划、组织、领导和控制。然而,在20世纪60年代末,亨利·明茨伯格对5位高管进行了仔细的研究,以确定这些经理在工作中做了什么。在Mintzberg的框架中,经理由3个角色组成:信息角色、人际角色和决策角色。本文的结构将首先讨论管理学中的法约尔和明茨伯格理论,然后比较和对比描述管理任务的功能和过程方法,最后是假设部分。本文的目的是找出并证明法约尔和明茨伯格思想的异同,以期能帮助读者提前丰富自己的知识。

Henri Fayol's theory 亨利法约尔理论

Henri Fayol identified four functions in management popular as the term POLC: Planning, Organising, Leading, and Controlling. The first term is planning, described as formulating idea and performance for goals to be accomplished. Organising, defined as the arrangement of all issues in accordance with attainment of the work, including task, people, or any other resources. Leading, the act of maintaining motivation among the workers hence all are inspired to work hard and able to achieve high performance. Eventually, Controlling is reckoned as the act of measuring performance and taking action to desired results. An evaluation is required to improve the outcome on the next performance (Schermerhorn, Campling, Poole & Wiesner, 2004).

Henri Mintzberg's theory 亨利明茨伯格理论

Henri Mintzberg is known as the initiator of 3 significant roles in management. Mintzberg stated that the actual work methods of managers differed quite drastically from popular images of managers as reflective, systematic planners spending considerable quiet time in their offices poring over formal reports (Bartol et al, 1995). Managers, by Mintzberg, are comprised of intrapersonal role, informational role and decisional role. Intrapersonal role is the role in which people and sense of duties symbolic in nature are involved. This role comprised of figurehead, leader, and liaison. Informational role is associated with receiving, collecting, and disseminating information, which is monitor, disseminator, and spokesperson. Furthermore, decisional role is the role which revolves around making decision and entrepreneur, disturbance handler, resource allocator, and negotiator are included.

The comparison between the function and the process approach

As described by Fayol that planning is the process to predict the future in which required personal and interpersonal competencies in building it. Mintzberg's roles of the figurehead, leader, liaison, monitor, entrepreneur, resource allocator seems to demonstrate that those roles plan inasmuch as Monitor, according to Mintzberg, is responsible for motivation and activation of subordinates; responsible for staffing, training, and associated duties, this is evident that both sides do planning. As argued by Lamond (2004), when we examine Fayol's planning function, there is a series of behaviours that constitute the enactment of Mintzberg's managerial role in the process of planning, such as information gathering, consultation, etc. For example, transmitting information through the disseminator role or representing the organisation through the negotiator role in itself has little meaning unless it is linked to a purpose such as the POLC (Bartol et al, 1995). In Fayol's view, controlling means verifying whether everything works as the plan, in the same vein, Mintzberg's stated that disturbance handler takes corrective action when an organisation faces unexpected disturbances; this proves both of them agree that there must be one to control the situation whenever it goes against plan. As we compare the leader role (motivating and activating subordinates, staffing, training and associated duties), we can broaden our appreciation of the activities in terms of whether they are aimed at assessing the future and making provision for it (planning), providing the undertaking with raw materials, tools, capital, personnel (organizing), making unity, energy, initiative, and loyalty prevail among the personnel (commanding), "harmonizing" all the activities of the concern (coordinating) or verifying whether everything occurs in conformity with the plans, instructions and principles (controlling) (Lamond, 2004).

Once stated by Wren (1994) as cited in Lamond (2004), As far from representing the 'folklore' of Fayol's functions, what Mintzberg has done, in fact, is make trying to elaborate the roles in which managers (and others) engage when carrying out their managerial functions. In other words, Mintzberg has provided some of the empirical reports that establish the link between the managerial behaviours, via the roles that managers perform rather than representing competing views with Fayol then, they are simply different views with the similar thought.
X

您可以截屏并微信扫二维码

微信号:littlefairyessay1

(点击微信号复制,添加好友)

打开微信

微信号已复制,请打开微信联系客服!
QQ号已复制,请打开QQ添加客服好友!